From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:10:24 +0900 Message-ID: <49D1DE00.9030600@gmail.com> References: <1237910776-10983-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <200903281451.01361.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090328140405.GA2741@liondog.tnic> <49D08CEC.3010705@kernel.org> <49D0A985.7090307@panasas.com> <49D0FF56.3080205@kernel.org> <49D1D7A3.40303@panasas.com> <49D1DCE2.1050201@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:13295 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752374AbZCaJKb (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:10:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49D1DCE2.1050201@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: petkovbb@gmail.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org I really should proof read before hitting the send button. My head is somehow pretty good at messing up sentences. Tejun Heo wrote: > The reason why I want with sgl is because it's the sg mapping went it has ... > wouldn't be that large anyway. Both aren't worth worrying about > considering how relative coldness of the path and other overhead of Eh.. that was a nice mix of "how the path is relatively cold" and "relative coldness of the path". :-) Thanks. -- tejun