From: Dustin Harrison <d.harrison@sutus.com>
To: Sagar Borikar <sagar.borikar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ata_check_status_mmio exception kernel panic
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:56:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D64DE0.8060400@sutus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fb94e50903312006y12717b8dh7dd7769f3f5b1dda@mail.gmail.com>
Sagar Borikar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are facing random kernel panics on drive removal when IO is
> happening to RAID. Note that kernel panic is random and not every time
> it happens. This is mips based production system and kernel is 2.6.18.
> Unfortunately we can't upgrade the kernel as its on field.
>
> Here is the log that we have got,
>
> Data bus error, epc == 80377358, ra == 80377384
> Oops[#1]:
> Cpu 0
> $ 0 : 00000000 804d0024 c001e0c7 0001000b
> $ 4 : 811a829c 811a8d5c 00000260 804d358c
> $ 8 : 90008000 1000001f 00000000 852c4000
> $12 : 87a2bb80 00006764 00000000 00000000
> $16 : 811a8d5c 811a829c 811a829c 00000001
> $20 : 80513d98 00000000 00000000 00000000
> $24 : 00000000 2b0c2ba0
> $28 : 80512000 80513be0 00000000 80377384
> Hi : 00000000
> Lo : 00000000
> epc : 80377358 ata_check_status_mmio+0x4/0x10 Not tainted
> ra : 80377384 ata_check_status+0x20/0x3c
> Status: 90008003 KERNEL EXL IE
> Cause : 0000201c
> PrId : 000034c1
> Modules linked in: aes
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=80512000, task=80514fc8)
> Stack : 00000000 803ff4bc 00000000 00000000 80377240 80364204 8703c6a8 805bccc8
> 8011d1a8 80434840 811a829c 811a8ccc 8037731c 871bf660 00000001 805bccc8
> 8703c6a8 00000000 8037068c 8538db80 805345d8 80513cd8 00000001 805ce368
> 811a8348 00000001 80378e54 00000001 82560238 82560238 8011dfd8 00000001
> 00010000 811a829c 811a829c c001e000 80378f60 871bf660 871bf660 00000000
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [<80377358>] ata_check_status_mmio+0x4/0x10
> [<80377384>] ata_check_status+0x20/0x3c
> [<80377240>] ata_tf_read_mmio+0x1c/0xd8
> [<8037731c>] ata_tf_read+0x20/0x3c
> [<8037068c>] ata_qc_complete+0xb4/0x128
> [<80378e54>] ata_port_abort+0xc4/0x100
> [<80378f60>] ata_port_freeze+0x54/0x78
> [<8037b7b8>] sil_host_intr+0x208/0x220
> [<8037b8a4>] sil_interrupt+0xd4/0x108
>
Hi Sagar,
I also run a MIPS platform and have seen this problem in 2.6.22. It
stems from the Sil3512 (and possibly others) not allowing read access to
the taskfile registers while a DMA transfer is active. What happens for
me is that when DMA_ENABLE is true the Sil3512 (in my case) will
disallow reads to the taskfile registers. So any event that triggers a
port freeze during an interrupt while DMA is active causes a bus error
to be thrown when the ata_check_status call fires. I cannot reproduce
this on x86. I assume it handles the taskfile read error differently.
As a workaround I have used this patch on sata_sil.c to cover up the
problem and stop the kernel panics. But I don't think this is the best
approach.
--- drivers/ata/sata_sil.c.orig 2009-04-01 18:15:55.000000000 -0700
+++ drivers/ata/sata_sil.c 2009-04-03 10:51:56.000000000 -0700
@@ -454,6 +454,23 @@
err_hsm:
qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_HSM;
freeze:
+
+ /* Before we do a port freeze we need to ensure DMA_ENABLE is off.
+ * This is because the controller will not give us access to the
taskfile
+ * registers while a DMA is in progress and ata_qc_complete is
the first
+ * function executed in ata_port_freeze. ata_port_freeze will
attempt to
+ * access the tf registers and give us a host bus error kernel panic.
+ *
+ * This code is repeated from ata_bmdma_stop because we may not
have a
+ * valid qc to pass to ata_bmdma_stop.
+ */
+ iowrite8(ioread8(ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr) & ~SIL_DMA_ENABLE,
ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr);
+
+ /* According to ata_bmdma_stop, an HDMA transition requires on
PIO cycle.
+ * But we can't read a taskfile register.
+ */
+ ioread8(ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr)
+
ata_port_freeze(ap);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 3:06 ata_check_status_mmio exception kernel panic Sagar Borikar
2009-04-01 3:08 ` Sagar Borikar
2009-04-01 3:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-03 17:56 ` Dustin Harrison [this message]
2009-04-04 4:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-07 2:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-04 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-07 3:02 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D64DE0.8060400@sutus.com \
--to=d.harrison@sutus.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagar.borikar@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).