linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:49:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DDFCDE.7020804@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49DDFC96.7090305@kernel.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Thus 'set' has always been an illusion for libata.  It's really been 
>>> read-only.
>> Which nicely solves the flags2 problem - we have flags, and we have
>> dynamic flags and if we move the other changing flags into dynflags over
>> time all will be happy.
> 
> Umm... there's already ap->pflags for the purpose and it was splitted
> out for exactly the same reason.  If we're running out of flags space,
> I think we better switch to bitfields than introducing flagsN and
                                 ^^^^^
				 map
Sorry, sleep deprived.  :-)

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-09 13:32 [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can Alan Cox
2009-04-09 12:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 12:53   ` Alan Cox
2009-04-09 13:08     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 13:12       ` Alan Cox
2009-04-09 13:33         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 13:41           ` Alan Cox
2009-04-09 13:45             ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 13:48             ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-09 13:49               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-09 13:45         ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-09 13:58           ` Alan Cox
2009-04-09 14:02             ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-09 13:02 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-09 13:08   ` Alan Cox
2009-04-13 16:32     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-13 16:39       ` Alan Cox
2009-04-13 16:57         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 13:25   ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-09 16:57     ` Mark Lord
2009-04-09 20:42       ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-10  0:38     ` Douglas Gilbert
2009-04-10  0:47       ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DDFCDE.7020804@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).