From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:42:24 -0400 Message-ID: <49DE5DB0.3030209@garzik.org> References: <20090409133221.18202.63779.stgit@t61.ukuu.org.uk> <49DDF1EB.2060200@rtr.ca> <49DDF744.1090209@garzik.org> <49DE2905.3030102@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:36987 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759636AbZDIUma (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:42:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49DE2905.3030102@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Tejun Heo , Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , LKML Mark Lord wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> a single utility should be used to configure a SATA+SAS controller >> port. Requiring use of hdparm when the port is in SATA mode, and sg_* >> when the port is in SAS mode, is a bit annoying. > .. > > That's why hdparm uses sg_* whenever possible already. Does hdparm really call out to external applications sg_senddiag, sg_opcodes, sg_inq, sg_turs, etc.? Jeff