From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: <49DE9726.40007@garzik.org> References: <20090409133221.18202.63779.stgit@t61.ukuu.org.uk> <49DDF1EB.2060200@rtr.ca> <49DDF744.1090209@garzik.org> <49DE9513.7050607@interlog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47074 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753576AbZDJArr (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:47:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49DE9513.7050607@interlog.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: dgilbert@interlog.com Cc: Mark Lord , Tejun Heo , Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , LKML Douglas Gilbert wrote: > As for the freestanding ata_transport idea which transport > would a mvsas host adapter belong to which has one phy > connected to a SATA disk, another connected to a SAS disk and > a third one connected to a SAS expander with lots of SATA > disks the other side of that? Only the direct attach example would use ata_transport. Jeff