From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Implementing NVMHCI...
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:15:42 +0300
Message-ID: <49E213AE.4060506@redhat.com>
References: <20090412091228.GA29937@elte.hu>	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0904121806060.9521@tamago.serverit.net> <20090412162018.6c1507b4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:58380 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750815AbZDLQSA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:18:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090412162018.6c1507b4@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@ntfs-3g.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>, Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>

Alan Cox wrote:
>> The atomic building units (sector size, block size, etc) of NTFS are 
>> entirely parametric. The maximum values could be bigger than the 
>> currently "configured" maximum limits. 
>>     
>
> That isn't what bites you - you can run 8K-32K ext2 file systems but if
> your physical page size is smaller than the fs page size you have a
> problem.
>
> The question is whether the NT VM can cope rather than the fs.
>   

A quick test shows that it can.  I didn't try mmap(), but copying files 
around worked.

Did you expect it not to work?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function