linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "Zhao, Richard" <Richard.Zhao@amd.com>, shane.huang@amd.com
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ahci: implement handoff quirk
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:41:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E45A2D.8090107@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E45460.8010809@kernel.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>> We probably need to do this...
>>>>
>>>> it's not a controller requirement but a BIOS one, so in theory even an
>>>> existing, deployed AHCI 1.2 platform could suddenly require BIOS/OS
>>>> handoff, if a BIOS update suddenly starts doing new and weird stuff
>>>> in SMI.
>>>>
>>>> Note that we need to do BIOS/OS handoff upon resume as well as at boot
>>>> time.
>>> Yeah, probably.  Do you know of any system which makes use of this
>>> feature?  I'm a bit uneasy about committing it without any testing.
>> I don't.
>>
>> But the purpose of the feature is to tell BIOS to cleanup and stop using
>> the hardware.  It's a dumb feature, because of compatibility realities,
>> but hey, other network and SCSI drivers have been doing this sort of
>> synchronization with their on-board firmwares for years.
>>
>> IMO the more dangerous route is to continue loading ahci, without first
>> telling the BIOS to clean up and get out of our way.
> 
> Hmmm.... yeah, I'm just worried a bit about adding a chunk of
> completely untested code.  How about adding a big fat warning message
> which gets triggered if the handoff thing seems to be active?

Yeah, printing out something makes a lot of sense, but I would just add 
it to the flags output in ahci_print_info() or similar.   If we don't 
see any further action from ahci (or the system as a whole), we know 
something exploded very early in the AHCI driver load.

Or maybe AMD (I see they're CC'd) could test this for us?  AMD, what say 
you?

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-18  3:37 [PATCH RFC] ahci: implement handoff quirk Tejun Heo
2009-04-11 16:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 17:51   ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-11 18:02     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14  9:16       ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-14  9:41         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2009-04-15  1:54           ` Huang, Shane
2009-12-17  6:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-12-18  3:54   ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E45A2D.8090107@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=Richard.Zhao@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shane.huang@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).