linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com
Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] ide-tape: remove back-to-back REQUEST_SENSE 	detection
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:12:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E8F0A7.5040208@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ea470500904170403n621f84det8cfec405131d893c@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Honestly, I don't know. The code predates even the initial git
> commit of the kernel so I guess nobody knows?

Heh.. maybe Mark does.

> And yeah, such a check looks a bit too much so I won't have any
> problem with removing it. Nevertheless, we need the small fix above
> in the ->do_request callback for all other packet commands since
> ide-tape uses currently ide_queue_pc_tail() for sending those. I
> know, I know, it is ugly and we're working on it :).

Can you explain a bit more about the bug?  I'm not really following.

>> Yet another problem is that idetape_flush_tape_buffers() uses pc which
>> is on stack which drive->pc ends up pointing directly to, so it won't
>> work.  Nobody expects that the pointer it passed into an API should be
>> accessible by the API implementation after it was done with it.
>> That's just a silly thing to do.
> 
> The whole on stack passing should be passe :) soon since we're about to kill
> those ide_atapi_pc's.

Hooray.

> As I said before, this is very old code that is really rusty and
> we're trying to janitor it slowly.

Yeap, sure.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-17  9:33 [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 01/15] block: clear req->errors on bio completion only for fs requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 02/15] ide-tape: remove back-to-back REQUEST_SENSE detection Tejun Heo
2009-04-17 10:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-17 10:35     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-17 10:40       ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-17 11:03         ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-17 21:12           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-17 21:27             ` Mark Lord
2009-04-18 19:48             ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-18 21:39               ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-19  7:28                 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-19  7:36                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-18 16:51     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 21:42       ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 03/15] ide: use blk_run_queue() instead of blk_start_queueing() Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 04/15] ide: don't set REQ_SOFTBARRIER Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 05/15] ide kill unused ide_cmd->special Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 06/15] ide-cd: clear sense buffer before issuing request sense Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 07/15] ide-floppy: block pc always uses bio Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 08/15] ide-taskfile: don't abuse rq->buffer Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 09/15] ide-atapi: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 10/15] ide-cd: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 11/15] ide: add helpers for preparing sense requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 12/15] ide-cd: convert to using generic sense request Tejun Heo
2009-04-19  9:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-19  9:28     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-19  9:30       ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 13/15] ide-atapi: convert ide-{floppy,tape} to using preallocated sense buffer Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 14/15] ide-cd,atapi: use bio for internal commands Tejun Heo
2009-04-17  9:33 ` [PATCH 15/15] ide-pm: don't abuse rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-04-18 16:32 ` [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups, take#2 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 20:04   ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-18 21:43   ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-18 22:04     ` [GIT PATCH " Tejun Heo
2009-04-20 11:47       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-20 11:59         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E8F0A7.5040208@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).