From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update IDE entry Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:58:31 +0900 Message-ID: <49F3DBE7.4030905@gmail.com> References: <200904232248.31735.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200904241154.04860.bzolnier@gmail.com> <9ea470500904240941s53f41b2dq1c4e5bc85b6244d7@mail.gmail.com> <200904242121.16910.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090425092816.GA6212@liondog.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:48289 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751825AbZDZD5f (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:57:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090425092816.GA6212@liondog.tnic> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Sergei Shtylyov , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:21:16PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> Moreover, I would prefer getting patches which don't need updating. ;-) > > Sounds like a good idea, let's do that! :0) > Great. :-) To rebase or not seems to be an issue people have different opinions about. Some trees get rebased regularly while others seldomly or never. Not being a maintainer, I prefer trees which don't get rebased but being able to provide cross-tree sync points is one of the biggest benefits and as long as they can be established when necessary, I guess to-each-his/her-own. Thanks. -- tejun