From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
linux-ide@vger.
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:19:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F95101.3010004@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430064549.GC6725@liondog.tnic>
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Fancy words aside, it basically boils down to allowing llds to do
>> either "rq->resid_len = blk_rq_bytes() - xferred" on completion or
>> "rq->resid_len = blk_rq_bytes()" on issue and "rq->resid_len -=
>> increments" while processing.
>
> Actually, the second one sounds more natural: resid_len == data_len on
> issue and decrementing while travelling through block layer and LLDD,
> while resid_len == 0 in issue might get confused somewhere.
Yeap, it depends on how the specific low level driver is doing it.
> And I like it too, we've been coming up with all sorts of hacks in
> ide-atapi wrt to residual completion and accounting of what got xferred
> already and rq->resid_len is much more cleaner, IMHO.
>
> /me testing...
AFAICT, residual count handling in ide was most broken. This patch
doesn't fix anything other than making it report 0 resid_len on SG_IO
which is usually better than reporting full residual count. The only
place inside ide where residual count is used in the tape driver to
determine actually transferred size. That part works okay with the
patch applied.
Hmmm... maybe it's about time to finally clean up residual count
handling in ide and libata, which BTW doesn't do anything about it at
the moment.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 9:13 [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] nbd: don't clear rq->sector and nr_sectors unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] ide-tape: don't initialize rq->sector for rw requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:41 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-30 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 7:19 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-30 7:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <1241037446.4516.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2009-04-30 17:30 ` Adrian McMenamin
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] ide: convert to rq " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 5:06 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:47 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-30 15:35 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-01 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 1:32 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 13:51 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 4:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 1:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] ide: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: hide request sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 16:07 ` [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-01 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 2:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F95101.3010004@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger. \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).