From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com,
petkovbb@googlemail.com, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com,
mike.miller@hp.com, chirag.kantharia@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
zaitcev@redhat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
paul.clements@steeleye.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com,
tim@cyberelk.net, jeremy@xensource.com, adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk,
oakad@yahoo.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
ballabio_dario@emc.com, davem@davemloft.net,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:47:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F9AC04.9060403@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240996428-10159-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 04/29/2009 12:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> With recent unification of fields, it's now guaranteed that
> rq->data_len always equals blk_rq_bytes(). Convert all non-IDE direct
> users to accessors. IDE will be converted in a separate patch.
>
> [ Impact: convert direct rq->data_len usages to blk_rq_bytes() ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>
> Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
<snip>
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++--
> fs/exofs/osd.c | 4 ++--
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
> index 2a5f077..d178a8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
> @@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ int osd_finalize_request(struct osd_request *or,
> return ret;
> }
> OSD_DEBUG("out bytes=%llu (bytes_req=%u)\n",
> - _LLU(or->out.total_bytes), or->out.req->data_len);
> + _LLU(or->out.total_bytes), blk_rq_bytes(or->out.req));
> }
> if (or->in.bio) {
> ret = blk_rq_append_bio(or->request->q, or->in.req, or->in.bio);
> @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ int osd_finalize_request(struct osd_request *or,
> return ret;
> }
> OSD_DEBUG("in bytes=%llu (bytes_req=%u)\n",
> - _LLU(or->in.total_bytes), or->in.req->data_len);
> + _LLU(or->in.total_bytes), blk_rq_bytes(or->in.req));
> }
>
> or->out.pad_buff = sg_out_pad_buffer;
Sorry about this stupid debug-print. Leftover from the learning days
Ack for this bit.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 39b3acf..3d16c70 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -682,14 +682,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_release_buffers);
> static void scsi_end_bidi_request(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> {
> struct request *req = cmd->request;
> - unsigned int dlen = req->data_len;
> - unsigned int next_dlen = req->next_rq->data_len;
>
> req->resid_len = scsi_out(cmd)->resid;
> req->next_rq->resid_len = scsi_in(cmd)->resid;
>
> /* The req and req->next_rq have not been completed */
> - BUG_ON(blk_end_bidi_request(req, 0, dlen, next_dlen));
> + BUG_ON(blk_end_bidi_request(req, 0, blk_rq_bytes(req),
> + blk_rq_bytes(req->next_rq)));
>
Just blk_end_request_all() actually. If you let blk_end_request_all also do bidi
> scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
>
and then it can be in-lined into caller, where blk_pc_request(req) just do blk_end_request_all
regardless (and only the residual setting is conditional)
I'll send a patch to scsi_lib later once this settles a bit.
> @@ -966,7 +965,7 @@ static int scsi_init_sgtable(struct request *req, struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb,
> BUG_ON(count > sdb->table.nents);
> sdb->table.nents = count;
> if (blk_pc_request(req))
> - sdb->length = req->data_len;
> + sdb->length = blk_rq_bytes(req);
> else
> sdb->length = blk_rq_sectors(req) << 9;
Is this true. I thought they must be the same now. I was actually anticipating this if() removed.
> return BLKPREP_OK;
> @@ -1087,21 +1086,21 @@ int scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
> if (unlikely(ret))
> return ret;
> } else {
> - BUG_ON(req->data_len);
> + BUG_ON(blk_rq_bytes(req));
>
> memset(&cmd->sdb, 0, sizeof(cmd->sdb));
> req->buffer = NULL;
> }
>
> cmd->cmd_len = req->cmd_len;
> - if (!req->data_len)
> + if (!blk_rq_bytes(req))
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_NONE;
> else if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE)
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE;
> else
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>
> - cmd->transfersize = req->data_len;
> + cmd->transfersize = blk_rq_bytes(req);
> cmd->allowed = req->retries;
> return BLKPREP_OK;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c
> index 48ba413..1030327 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int scsi_map_user_pages(struct scsi_tgt_cmd *tcmd, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> * we use REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC so scsi_init_io doesn't set the
> * length for us.
> */
> - cmd->sdb.length = rq->data_len;
> + cmd->sdb.length = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/osd.c b/fs/exofs/osd.c
> index b249ae9..c97420b 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/osd.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/osd.c
> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ int exofs_check_ok_resid(struct osd_request *or, u64 *in_resid, u64 *out_resid)
>
> /* FIXME: should be include in osd_sense_info */
> if (in_resid)
> - *in_resid = or->in.req ? or->in.req->data_len : 0;
> + *in_resid = or->in.req ? blk_rq_bytes(or->in.req) : 0;
+ *in_resid = or->in.req ? or->in.req->resid_len : 0;
>
> if (out_resid)
> - *out_resid = or->out.req ? or->out.req->data_len : 0;
> + *out_resid = or->out.req ? blk_rq_bytes(or->out.req) : 0;
+ *out_resid = or->out.req ? or->out.req->resid_len : 0;
>
> return ret;
> }
OK This segment is wrong. It should be moved to the residual count patch
(PATCH 3/10) the assignment into *in_resid/*out_resid should shourly triggered
a warning ;-)
Thanks
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 9:13 [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] nbd: don't clear rq->sector and nr_sectors unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] ide-tape: don't initialize rq->sector for rw requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:41 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-30 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 6:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 7:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30 9:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <1241037446.4516.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2009-04-30 17:30 ` Adrian McMenamin
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] ide: convert to rq " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 5:06 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:47 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-04-30 15:35 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-01 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 1:32 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 13:51 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04 4:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 1:36 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] ide: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 9:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: hide request sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 16:07 ` [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-01 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03 2:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F9AC04.9060403@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com \
--cc=adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ballabio_dario@emc.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=chirag.kantharia@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
--cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
--cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
--cc=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tim@cyberelk.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).