Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] misc libata improvements

Niklas Cassel
2023-01-04T10:16:44Z

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 01:43:54PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > On 12/30/22 01:59, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > This series contains misc libata improvements.
> > >
> > > These improvements were identified while developing support for Command
> > > Duration Limits (CDL). All patches in this series (i.e. V1 of these
> > > patches) were orignally sent out as part of the CDL series, found here:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/510732e0-7962-cf54-c22c-f1d7066895f5@opensource.wdc.com/T/
> > >
> > > However, as these improvements are completely unrelated to CDL, they can
> > > be merged independently, and should not need to wait for other patches.
> >
> > Applied the series to for-6.3. Patch 1 had a small conflict that I fixed
> > up. Thanks !
>
> I had a look at the SHA1 for this patch in your tree, and it looks good.
>
> However, patches 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 7/7 seem to miss your chain sign-off.

Is this perhaps because checkpatch complains if the same sign-off exists
twice on the same patch?

Not sure if this should be ignored or not...
To me, it seems more important to keep a record of the chain,
than to keep checkpatch happy, but I could be wrong here..

Kind regards,
Niklas