From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ide: add "ignore_hpa" module parameter Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:49:09 -0600 Message-ID: <4A1C7FF5.4060205@gmail.com> References: <200905252344.11826.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200905260106.13705.elendil@planet.nl> <200905261423.40117.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200905261453.22428.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f168.google.com ([209.85.220.168]:62015 "EHLO mail-fx0-f168.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754846AbZEZXtO (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 19:49:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200905261453.22428.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Frans Pop Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Frans Pop wrote: >> Moreover the (much needed) work from Tejun doesn't help a tiny bit in >> case of people migrating their *working* setups from IDE to libata > > From what I've seen now that seems the most important case that needs > supporting, as well as the case where a working setup would migrate from > IDE with old HPA default to IDE with new HPA default. > > Naive thought: wouldn't it be possible to check whether a partition > overlaps the HPA boundary and warn or even bug out in that case? It does, you get a warning about the partition exceeding device capacity. Easy to miss that, however.