From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATA driver for CF interface on AT91SAM9260 SoC Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:09:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4A3D17DB.30001@garzik.org> References: <1245181151-7040-1-git-send-email-geomatsi@gmail.com> <20090618002004.54701b40@realm> <20090617235351.1cb05c97@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090618222401.462b2d44@realm> <20090618193720.26830bc8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090619082740.6986544a@realm> <20090620165439.6314f9ef@realm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:46443 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753236AbZFTRJ2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:09:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090620165439.6314f9ef@realm> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergey Matyukevich Cc: Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Victor , Sergey Lapin , Andrew Victor Sergey Matyukevich wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:27:40 +0400 > Sergey Matyukevich wrote: >=20 >> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:37:20 +0100 >> Alan Cox wrote: >> >>>> Concerning the first point, this module parameter is used in >>>> driver probing function:=20 >>>> ap->pio_mask =3D pio_mask; >>>> >>>> I would suggest to keep pio_mask as a module parameter, since it >>>> might be useful to modify it in order to =D1=81ut down PIO speed, = e.g. >>>> for testing purposes.=20 >>> Libata already has general support for that. (Arguably we should >>> take it out of the pata_legacy driver in the same way) >> >> Patch update: module param for pio_mask removed. >> >> >=20 > Hello, > Is there any chance for this driver to be accepted during current mer= ge > window ? Absolutely... is this the last revision of the driver (for the moment)= ? Jeff