From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream] sata_nv: use hardreset only for post-boot probing Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:17:33 +0900 Message-ID: <4A541DDD.7090608@kernel.org> References: <4A2F60C3.2070805@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:60064 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751178AbZGHESi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:18:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: david@lang.hm Cc: Jeff Garzik , Robert Hancock , lament.email.si@gmail.com, IDE/ATA development list david@lang.hm wrote: > this does not apply to 2.6.30, is there a version of this patch that > would apply to 2.6.30? There isn't one. > also, what testing would need to be done on this before it is a > candidate for -stable? sata_nv saw many disruptions with recent reset protocol update and a lot of changes which looked perfectly okay caused interesting and twisted regressions. I'm not all that confident about pushing this to -stable. It's not like a lot of systems are broken on current 2.6.30 after all. Thanks. -- tejun