From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Andrei Tanas <andrei@tanas.ca>
Cc: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:15:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A9D1E7D.1050104@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <640f6103c45b6cba6f84f887bde227e4@localhost>
Andrei Tanas wrote:
>>>>> The drive might take a longer time like this when doing error handling
>>>>> (sector remapping, etc), but then I would expect to see your remapped
>>>>> sector count grow.
>>>> Yes, this is a possibility and according to the spec, libata EH should
>>>> be retrying flushes a few times before giving up but I'm not sure
>>>> whether keeping retrying for several minutes is a good idea either.
>>>> Is it?
>>> ..
>>>
>>> Libata will retry only when the FLUSH returns an error,
>>> and the next FLUSH will continue after the point where
>>> the first attempt failed.
>>>
>>> But if the drive can still auto-relocate sectors, then the
>>> first FLUSH won't actually fail.. it will simply take longer
>>> than normal.
>>>
>>> A couple of those, and we're into the tens of seconds range
>>> for time.
>>>
>>> Still, it would be good to actually produce an error like that
>>> to examine under controlled circumstances.
>>>
>>> Hmm.. I had a drive here that gave symptoms like that.
>>> Eventually, I discovered that drive had run out of relocatable
>>> sectors, too. Mmm.. I'll see if I can get it back (loaned it out)
>>> and perhaps we can recreate this specific scenario on it..
>> ..
>>
>> I checked today, and that drive is no longer available.
>
> Mine errored out again with exactly the same symptoms, this time after only
> few days and with the "tunable" set to 2 sec. I got a warranty replacement
> but haven't shipped this one yet. Let me know if you want it.
..
Not me. But perhaps Tejun ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <004e01ca25e4$c11a54e0$434efea0$@ca>
[not found] ` <9cfb6af689a7010df166fdebb1ef516b.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
[not found] ` <4A948A82.4080901@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <b585ed9f13649050bbc984869d081315.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
[not found] ` <4A94905F.7050705@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <005101ca25f4$09006830$1b013890$@ca>
[not found] ` <4A94A0E6.4020401@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <005401ca25ff$9ac91cc0$d05b5640$@ca>
[not found] ` <4A950FA6.4020408@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <92cb16daad8278b0aa98125b9e1d057a@localhost>
[not found] ` <4A95573A.6090404@redhat.com>
2009-08-26 18:12 ` MD/RAID: what's wrong with sector 1953519935? Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 0:07 ` Mark Lord
2009-08-27 1:37 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-08-27 2:33 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <d086b110526f8bac2f562850dfc70b03@localhost>
2009-08-27 21:57 ` MD/RAID time out writing superblock Ric Wheeler
2009-08-31 8:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-31 12:04 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-31 12:20 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-07 11:44 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-07 11:59 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-09 12:02 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-14 7:41 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 7:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 12:48 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-14 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 14:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-16 23:19 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 13:29 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 13:32 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 13:37 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 16:16 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 16:17 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-18 17:05 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-21 10:26 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-21 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-22 6:16 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-20 18:36 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-14 13:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 14:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-14 14:34 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 13:14 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-09-07 16:55 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-07 23:26 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-14 7:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 21:13 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-14 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-16 22:28 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-16 23:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 0:34 ` Neil Brown
2009-09-17 12:00 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 11:57 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-17 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-17 16:36 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-18 0:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-18 2:47 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-18 17:07 ` Chris Webb
2009-09-20 18:46 ` Robert Hancock
2009-09-21 0:02 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-09-17 13:35 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-17 15:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-31 12:21 ` Mark Lord
2009-08-31 23:45 ` Mark Lord
2009-09-01 13:07 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-01 13:15 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-09-01 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-01 13:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-09-01 14:18 ` Andrei Tanas
2009-09-02 21:58 ` Allan Wind
2009-09-04 19:39 ` Andrei Tanas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A9D1E7D.1050104@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=andrei@tanas.ca \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).