linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc5 regression: hd don't show up
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:19:37 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB04B39.7030907@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA6C569.9090901@klingt.org>

Hello,

Tim Blechmann wrote:
> with this patch, i could reproduce it again on the first boot. bootlog
> attached.

Thanks a lot for testing.  The offending commit is 816ab897.

commit 816ab89782ac139a8b65147cca990822bb7e8675
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed Oct 22 00:31:34 2008 +0900

    libata: set device class to NONE if phys_offline

    Reset methods don't have access to phys link status for slave links
    and may incorrectly indicate device presence causing unnecessary probe
    failures for unoccupied links.  This patch clears device class to NONE
    during post-reset processing if phys link is offline.

    As on/offlineness semantics is strictly defined and used in multiple
    places by the core layer, this won't change behavior for drivers which
    don't use slave links.

    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

The problem is that I don't really remember why I added this one back
then.  This is incorrect because the condition should be dealt with
later in the reset logic.  That didn't work quite as expected and I
ended up adding the above to work around that and it turned out wrong.
I'll dig deeper and find out what was the problem back then.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-16  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14  8:26 2.6.31-rc5 regression: hd don't show up Tim Blechmann
2009-08-14  9:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-14 12:34   ` Tim Blechmann
2009-08-16  2:54     ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-16 10:05       ` Tim Blechmann
2009-08-27  8:38         ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-27 10:21           ` Tim Blechmann
2009-08-27 11:35             ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-28 11:04               ` Tim Blechmann
2009-08-31  7:39                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-01 23:34                   ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-02  2:22                     ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-02  9:12                       ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-03 14:07                         ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-04 22:06                           ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-04 22:33                             ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-09-05  0:12                             ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-08 20:58                               ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-16  2:19                                 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-09-16  5:39                                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-16  7:36                                     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-16 12:00                                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-25  4:20                                         ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-25  7:46                                           ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-25  7:53                                             ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-25 11:47                                               ` Tim Blechmann
2009-09-25 13:21                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-02  5:20                                                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-02  7:30                                                     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-10-02  8:59                                                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-05  9:59                                                         ` Tim Blechmann
2009-10-06  7:30                                                           ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AB04B39.7030907@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@klingt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).