From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:35:18 +0900 Message-ID: <4AB25736.1060601@suse.de> References: <4A9BBC4A.6070708@redhat.com> <4A9BC023.10903@kernel.org> <20090907114442.GG18831@arachsys.com> <20090907115927.GU8710@arachsys.com> <20090909120218.GB21829@arachsys.com> <4AADF3C4.5060004@kernel.org> <4AADF471.2020801@suse.de> <4AAE3B9A.2060306@rtr.ca> <4AAE3F86.8090804@suse.de> <4AAE524C.2030401@rtr.ca> <20090916231921.GL1924@arachsys.com> <4AB239C8.2020203@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AB239C8.2020203@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Chris Webb , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ric Wheeler , Andrei Tanas , NeilBrown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list , Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, Mark Lord wrote: > Tejun.. do we do a FLUSH CACHE before issuing a non-NCQ command ? Nope. > If not, then I think we may need to add code to do it. Hmm... can you explain a bit more? That seems rather extreme to me. Thanks. -- tejun