From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Bernie Innocenti <bernie@codewiz.org>
Cc: Harri Olin <harri.olin@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sysadmin <sysadmin@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: sata_mv 0000:03:06.0: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x30000040
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:13:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACC076F.7020000@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254879618.1471.525.camel@giskard>
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Tue, 06-10-2009 a las 20:06 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
>>> The early revs of these chips did have a number of errata specific to PCI-X.
>> I checked the revision (09) against the sata_mv source and I couldn't
>> spot anything relevant to us.
>
> NEWSFLASH: today we replaced the 4x500GB Seagate drives with 4x1.5TB
> drives and reconstruction of the array has been running for 2h without a
> glitch.
>
> One interesting difference is that the 500GB drives were being
> configured in 1.5Gbps SATA mode. Another notable difference is the
> sequential read speed: ~70MB/s vs ~130MB/s with the 1.5TB model.
>
> Could the PCI bus errors be a red herring?
..
Dunno. Rev.9 == "C0" in Marvell terminology,
and that's the latest/final rev for the 6081 chip,
with most of the PCI-X bugs fixed or worked around.
So not much to go on there.
The Bus error report was real, though.
But with 3.0gb/sec sata connections, the chip will be
using some different internal clocks and timings,
which could be enough to avoid triggering the PCI errors.
I guess. Let's hope so, anyway.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-03 5:10 sata_mv 0000:03:06.0: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x30000040 Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-05 21:45 ` Mark Lord
2009-10-06 4:16 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-06 12:25 ` Harri Olin
2009-10-06 18:04 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-06 20:06 ` Mark Lord
2009-10-07 0:06 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-07 1:40 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-07 3:13 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-10-08 16:42 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-08 17:09 ` Tony Vroon
2009-10-14 15:24 ` [SOLVED] " Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-09 2:22 ` Christian Pernegger
2009-10-09 3:07 ` Mark Lord
2009-10-09 3:16 ` Mark Lord
2009-10-08 16:26 ` Bernie Innocenti
2009-10-08 21:51 ` Harri Olin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ACC076F.7020000@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=bernie@codewiz.org \
--cc=harri.olin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sysadmin@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).