From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Huemer Subject: Re: 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem - irq 23: nobody cared Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:00:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4ACDD45C.5090009@sbg.ac.at> References: <4ABBB8C2.2080901@sbg.ac.at> <200909251424.25334.elendil@planet.nl> <4ABCB732.9050609@sbg.ac.at> <200909251448.17671.elendil@planet.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx17.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.19]:51211 "EHLO mx.inode.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757789AbZJHMBJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:01:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200909251448.17671.elendil@planet.nl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Frans Pop Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , stable@kernel.org Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 25 September 2009, Alexander Huemer wrote: >>> So with the revert already in mainline for .32, the only thing left is >>> for that to get included in stable updates for .30 and .31. >> please see the last comment in [1]. >> can i do anything else to help ? > >> [1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 > > Yes, adding that comment was excellent. I also added the relevant people > in the CC of my previous mail, so it should get taken care of now. Unless > they have additional questions no further action from you should be > needed. it seems like the problem is _not_ solved. i just booted with 2.6.31.3. 2.6.31-gentoo-r2 is vanilla-2.6.31-r2 with a few unrelated patches. did the usual verification (compilation of gcc-4.3.4), and got this again: [ 1018.059729] irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) [ 1018.059734] Pid: 8656, comm: sh Tainted: G W 2.6.31-gentoo-r2-blackbit #1 [ 1018.059736] Call Trace: [ 1018.059738] [] ? __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d [ 1018.059748] [] ? note_interrupt+0x107/0x170 [ 1018.059751] [] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x8a/0xaa [ 1018.059755] [] ? handle_irq+0x17/0x1d [ 1018.059757] [] ? do_IRQ+0x54/0xb2 [ 1018.059761] [] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa [ 1018.059762] [] ? do_page_fault+0xed/0x2ef [ 1018.059769] [] ? do_page_fault+0x2d3/0x2ef [ 1018.059773] [] ? __put_user_4+0x1d/0x30 [ 1018.059776] [] ? page_fault+0x1f/0x30 [ 1018.059777] handlers: [ 1018.059778] [] (ahci_interrupt+0x0/0x426) [ 1018.059783] Disabling IRQ #23 so in my opinion reverting commit [1] with commit [2] missed the point. please comment. -alex [1] a5bfc4714b3f01365aef89a92673f2ceb1ccf246 [2] 31b239ad1ba7225435e13f5afc47e48eb674c0cc