From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Huemer Subject: Re: 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem - irq 23: nobody cared Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:55:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4AD2FD10.2010800@sbg.ac.at> References: <4ABBB8C2.2080901@sbg.ac.at> <200910101513.51320.elendil@planet.nl> <4AD2DFA4.9000602@kernel.org> <200910121148.16439.elendil@planet.nl> <4AD2FC60.8080705@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx10.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.10]:14841 "EHLO mx.inode.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755028AbZJLJ4M (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:56:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AD2FC60.8080705@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Frans Pop , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , alexander.huemer@sbg.ac.at Tejun Heo wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > >> On Monday 12 October 2009, Tejun Heo wrote: >> >>> Alexander, can you please attach full boot log and the output of >>> "lspci -nn"? Also, how reproducible is the problem? You already >>> answered to Frans' question but can you be more specific? >>> >> Full dmesg was made available earlier at: >> http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/dmesg_ahuemer_20090923 >> > > Does blacklisting i801_smbus make any difference? > > lspci -nn: http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/lspci_nn_ahuemer_20091012 what do you mean with "blacklisting i801_smbus" ? regards -alex