From: Alexander Huemer <alexander.huemer@sbg.ac.at>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
alexander.huemer@sbg.ac.at
Subject: Re: 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem - irq 23: nobody cared
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:49:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD422F2.4080308@sbg.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3E348.5030508@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> [cc'ing Jean and quoting whole body]
>
> Hello, Jean.
>
> It seems i2c_i801 is triggering IRQ storm on Alexander's machine. The
> original thread is
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/894187
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>
>> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>>
>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alexander Huemer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday 12 October 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alexander, can you please attach full boot log and the output of
>>>>>>>> "lspci -nn"? Also, how reproducible is the problem? You already
>>>>>>>> answered to Frans' question but can you be more specific?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Full dmesg was made available earlier at:
>>>>>>> http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/dmesg_ahuemer_20090923
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does blacklisting i801_smbus make any difference?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> lspci -nn:
>>>>> http://xx.vu/~ahuemer/lspci_nn_ahuemer_20091012
>>>>>
>>>>> what do you mean with "blacklisting i801_smbus" ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> [ 3.872387] i2c /dev entries driver
>>>> [ 3.873943] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT B -> GSI 23 (level,
>>>> low) -> IRQ 23
>>>> [ 3.875580] w83627hf: Found W83627HF chip at 0x290
>>>>
>>>> IRQ23 is also used by i801_smbus and it would be nice to confirm
>>>> whether the problem can still be triggered with that driver not
>>>> loaded. Adding "blacklist i2c_i801" to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
>>>> should probabaly do the trick.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> okay, i think you assume that i2c_i801 is a module.
>>> it is indeed built into the kernel.
>>> i'll rebuild the kernel without that component and run a test again.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> -alex
>>>
>> tejun, it seems you hit an interesting point.
>> i compiled kernel-2.6.31.3 with my ususal config _without_ i2c_i801.
>> my usual test (compilation of gcc-4.3.2) finished 5 times without the
>> error.
>> i'll let it run some more times over night.
>> does anybody have an idea how i can trace what exactly causes the error
>> during the compilation run so that i can create a short test program ?
>>
>> regards
>> -alex
>>
>
>
hi,
i compiled gcc in a loop over night, 14 times. no error.
it really seams i2c_i801 was the cause...
unfortunately i still don't know how i can extract the part of the gcc
compilation process that causes the error on an affected kernel.
that would enable me to create a simple test program.
regards
-alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4ABBB8C2.2080901@sbg.ac.at>
2009-09-24 19:24 ` 2.6.{30,31} x86_64 ahci problem - irq 23: nobody cared Frans Pop
2009-09-24 19:30 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-09-24 19:40 ` Frans Pop
2009-09-24 19:43 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-09-25 0:02 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-09-25 11:28 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-09-25 12:24 ` Frans Pop
2009-09-25 12:27 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-09-25 12:48 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 12:00 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-09 21:30 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-10 13:13 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-11 20:57 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-12 7:49 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 9:48 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-12 9:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 9:55 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-12 10:07 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 10:11 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-12 15:03 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-12 17:28 ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-13 2:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-13 6:49 ` Alexander Huemer [this message]
2009-10-13 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-14 11:45 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-21 8:38 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-21 10:01 ` Alexander Huemer
2009-10-21 11:28 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-26 15:01 ` Alexander Huemer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD422F2.4080308@sbg.ac.at \
--to=alexander.huemer@sbg.ac.at \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).