From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: Update experimental tags Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:21:39 +0300 Message-ID: <4B05B6E3.6080604@ru.mvista.com> References: <20091117144450.15430.83450.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200911191838.11791.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091119175051.6a91d160@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200911191852.23061.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091119182132.5155f819@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4B0590A2.9050306@ru.mvista.com> <20091119194008.2c97edcd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([206.112.117.35]:38135 "HELO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753298AbZKSVVs (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:21:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091119194008.2c97edcd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik Hello. Alan Cox wrote: >> I'd suggest to address the delay by another, separate patch to both >> pata_hpt37x and pata_hpt3x2n drivers, and accept Bart's original patch for >> bit reversing... >> > > If you can confirm the 371N is fine without switching to I/O cycles then > HPT371N datasheet says that the SRC1/2 registers are dual-mapped to PCI and I/O space. Are you paranoid enough to want me to test the drivers on the board with HPT371N too? :-) > I agree entirely with that and I'll push the udelay(10) into all three > I can't say anything about pata_hpt36x, I don't think I have HPT drivers that old... > plus the drivers/ide one unless Bart beats me to it. > I could beat you to it as well. :-) > Alan WBR, Sergei