From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata-acpi: missing _SDD is not an error Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:48:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0657D6.3000004@garzik.org> References: <4B03F585.3090000@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:35101 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbZKTIsW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:48:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B03F585.3090000@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: IDE/ATA development list , Takashi Iwai On 11/18/2009 08:24 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Missing _SDD is not an error. Don't treat it as one. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Reported-by: Takashi Iwai > --- > drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 15 +++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) hmmmm, do you have a link to the bug report? How critical is this? Is it a regression fix? We are very late into 2.6.32-rc, where we try to minimize the patches applied as much as possible. Jeff