From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 62/86] pata_pdc202xx_old: document known issues Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:38:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0D95C3.4020706@garzik.org> References: <20091125170218.5446.13513.sendpatchset@localhost> <200911251852.40281.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4B0D71A4.6090001@garzik.org> <200911251929.45897.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51033 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758813AbZKYUiZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:38:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200911251929.45897.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/25/2009 01:29 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > I think it is the best to leave up to the driver maintainer > (once we find out who this person is, MAINTAINERS file still > lacks info about PATA drivers in -rc8). The important thing is taking two minutes to write a relevant comment, not determining who is wearing a crown on his head. Jeff