From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Thin provisioning fixes Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:13:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0E9B08.3020204@teksavvy.com> References: <1258771524-26673-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <20091126105947.GA28120@infradead.org> <20091126110157.GV8742@kernel.dk> <20091126110545.GA364@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:8276 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754788AbZKZPNJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:13:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091126110545.GA364@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, willy@wil.cx, jgarzik@pobox.com, sandeen@redhat.com, rwheeler@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Note that we might have to add blacklists for this in libata pretty soon > as the OCZ Vertex seems to get it wrong, but that's material for another > patch not touching the block layer.. .. With the current (latest) firmware on the Vertex, it does not claim "read zeros after trim". Which is correct. How does this get something wrong? Thanks