From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Thin provisioning fixes Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:14:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4B0E9B56.3040904@teksavvy.com> References: <1258771524-26673-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <20091126105947.GA28120@infradead.org> <20091126110157.GV8742@kernel.dk> <20091126110545.GA364@infradead.org> <4B0E9B08.3020204@teksavvy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:50013 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755122AbZKZPOZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:14:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B0E9B08.3020204@teksavvy.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, willy@wil.cx, jgarzik@pobox.com, sandeen@redhat.com, rwheeler@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >> Note that we might have to add blacklists for this in libata pretty soon >> as the OCZ Vertex seems to get it wrong, but that's material for another >> patch not touching the block layer.. > .. > > With the current (latest) firmware on the Vertex, > it does not claim "read zeros after trim". > Which is correct. > > How does this get something wrong? .. Oh.. answering my own question here.. All of the earlier firmwares *did* get it wrong, so I suppose those could/should be X-listed. Cheers!