From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:16:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4B182A9F.5090708@garzik.org> References: <20091125170218.5446.13513.sendpatchset@localhost> <200912031339.14440.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4B17FB37.2030501@garzik.org> <200912032045.48728.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200912032045.48728.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alan Cox Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan, Can you sanity check me on these? > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (28): > ide-pci-generic: build fix ACK but skipped -- already applied myself > ata_piix: fix MWDMA handling on PIIX3 applied > pata_efar: fix wrong PIO timings being programmed applied > pata_efar: fix wrong MWDMA timings being programmed applied > pata_efar: MWDMA0 is unsupported skipped, pending discussion (just sent email) > pata_cmd640: document known issues rejected, for reasons already explained > pata_cs5520: remove dead VDMA support applied > pata_cypress: document known issues rejected, for reasons already explained > pata_hpt3x2n: fix overclocked MWDMA0 timing skipped, pending discussion (just sent email) > pata_hpt3x3: Power Management fix applied, on a hope and a prayer (did not see this posted to mailing list?). It looks correct to me. > pata_it8213: fix UDMA handling applied > pata_it8213: fix wrong PIO timings being programmed applied > pata_it8213: fix PIO2 underclocking applied > pata_it8213: fix wrong MWDMA timings being programmed applied > pata_it8213: fix it8213_pre_reset() documentation applied > pata_it8213: MWDMA0 is unsupported skipped, pending discussion (just sent email) > pata_legacy: fix QDI6580DP support applied > pata_legacy: fix access to control register for QDI6580 applied > pata_legacy: add pointers to QDI65x0 documentation applied. I did not think the file path issue raised was important enough to warrant patch rejection. > pata_marvell: fix marvell_pre_reset() documentation applied > pata_ns87415: Power Management fix applied > pata_oldpiix: MWDMA0 is unsupported skipped -- Alan, Sergey, comments? > pata_pdc202xx_old: document known issues rejected, for reasons already explained > pata_radisys: fix UDMA handling applied > pata_rdc: MWDMA0 is unsupported skipped -- Alan, Sergey, comments? > pata_rz1000: Power Management fix applied > pata_sis: Power Management fix applied > pata_via: clear UDMA transfer mode bit for PIO and MWDMA applied -- even though Alan's comment was correct. It is standard kernel practice to place cosmetic changes into their own patches, because it is standard kernel practice to break up logically distinct changes.