From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] libata-sff: remove CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:48:54 +0900 Message-ID: <4B58F5F6.9090001@gmail.com> References: <20100120142943.GE3580@faui49.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4B579C4A.3040907@gmail.com> <20100121120405.1085b6d3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:58886 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113Ab0AVAqi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:46:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100121120405.1085b6d3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Christoph Egger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, Reinhard.Tartler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de, David Howells (cc'ing David Howells, who BTW is on vacation till Feb) Hi! On 01/21/2010 09:04 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:14:02 +0900 > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY isn't used by anyone. Drop it. >> >> Reported-by: Christoph Egger >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Not unless this is cleared with the FRV maintainers who were using > it and I believe may still need it. > > Mr Howells ? David, the patch in question is, http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/20/396 Does FRV still need it? Thanks. -- tejun