linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: infernix <infernix@infernix.net>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATA port not detected when using AHCI on Intel 82801GB/GR/GH
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:29:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5A5F09.1070300@infernix.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5A4F7A.4040709@gmail.com>

On 23/01/10 02:23, Robert Hancock wrote:
>  From what I can gather from the ICH7 datasheet, when using AHCI the IDE
> controller is supposed to show up as device 1f.1 and the SATA controller
> as 1f.2. It seems like for some reason your BIOS is disabling the IDE
> controller entirely in that mode, which appears rather wrong.

Well kind of, but not completely since that old IDE PIIX driver does 
work when its set to Enhanced AHCI. It's just that it doesn't show up on 
the PCI bus, or so it seems at least.

> Do you have the latest BIOS for that board?

Yes, but it's a SOHO NAS box by Intel; the SS4200-E is the branded one 
that comes with some kind of EMC NAS software, and the ESW is the OEM 
version which is sold under various names, without the software. I've 
got the latter.

In either case, there's no BIOS upgrades, only "firmware" which is the 
EMC NAS stuff that gets shipped with the -E version, and Intel put up a 
notice on Jan 10th that the product is discontinued since Dec '09. So 
that's a dead end.

Can we force ata_piix to pick up the IDE controller? I mean the old IDE 
PIIX driver can do it (albeit terribly slow), so why can't ata_piix? I 
won't lose sleep if I have to pass an option to the kernel or modprobe 
for this to happen as it's an uncommon case.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-23  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-22  3:37 PATA port not detected when using AHCI on Intel 82801GB/GR/GH infernix
2010-01-22  5:01 ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-22 12:57   ` infernix
2010-01-23  1:23     ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-23  2:29       ` infernix [this message]
2010-01-23  7:18         ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-23 13:14           ` infernix
2010-01-23 10:14         ` Alan Cox
2010-01-23 13:08           ` infernix
2010-01-23 13:38             ` Alan Cox
2010-01-23 14:13               ` infernix
2010-01-23 14:30                 ` infernix
2010-02-12 23:30               ` infernix
2010-02-13  0:04                 ` Alan Cox
2010-02-13  0:21                   ` infernix
2010-01-22  5:31 ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-05  2:17 Joe Ceklosky
2010-02-06  1:43 ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B5A5F09.1070300@infernix.net \
    --to=infernix@infernix.net \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).