From: Bart Hartgers <bart.hartgers@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
juergen.metzdorf@telelev-dsl.de, markpschool@hotmail.com,
sporadic.crash@gmail.com, apopov@sirma.bg, david@coomber.co.za,
jay4mail@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:20:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B77DC6E.8070902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B772C19.90501@pobox.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 01:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch
>>> for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make
>>> sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be
>>> helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports.
>>
>> Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea.
>>
>>> Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is
>>> prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the
>>> vt6420 one)?
>>
>> I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough.
>
> Agreed... ping, Bart?
>
Hi Jeff,
I was waiting for some feedback on whether this patch actually solves
the problem for others as well. Unfortunately, I didn't get any response
so far, that's why I didn't resend the patch yet. But I guess it doesn't
make sense to wait any longer, so I'll redo the patch and send it in a
separate mail in a few minutes.
(I also tried searching for people suffering from this bug in the past 3
months, and couldn't find any. I _did_ see some recent posts on various
bug-lists by Tejun asking to test my patch, but again no response.)
Groeten,
Bart
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-14 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 23:56 [patch 0/2] sata_via: bugfixes for vt6420 and vt6421 Bart Hartgers
2010-01-16 23:56 ` [patch 1/2] sata_via: Correctly setup PIO/DMA for pata slave on vt6421 Bart Hartgers
2010-01-20 3:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20 19:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-16 23:56 ` [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write Bart Hartgers
2010-01-20 3:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20 4:53 ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-20 6:33 ` Bart Hartgers
2010-01-20 6:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-20 10:43 ` Bart Hartgers
2010-01-20 6:44 ` Bart Hartgers
2010-01-20 6:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-13 22:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-02-14 11:20 ` Bart Hartgers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B77DC6E.8070902@gmail.com \
--to=bart.hartgers@gmail.com \
--cc=apopov@sirma.bg \
--cc=david@coomber.co.za \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jay4mail@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=juergen.metzdorf@telelev-dsl.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markpschool@hotmail.com \
--cc=sporadic.crash@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).