From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x100),ata2.00: disabled, CD-ROM drive dead Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:31:04 +0900 Message-ID: <4BAFF4C8.9030402@kernel.org> References: <4B9EA02F.2070704@hardwarefreak.com> <4B9EC67A.3020201@gmail.com> <4B9ED027.30800@hardwarefreak.com> <4BAAB080.3010401@kernel.org> <4BAB2A94.8010001@hardwarefreak.com> <20100325215242.GA9785@localhost.localdomain> <4BAF9670.6010706@hardwarefreak.com> <4BAFB58C.5050702@gmail.com> <4BAFEA7A.50904@kernel.org> <4BAFEFA3.3090502@hardwarefreak.com> <4BAFF3B7.4060604@hardwarefreak.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:42441 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755423Ab0C2AbI (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:31:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BAFF3B7.4060604@hardwarefreak.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Stan Hoeppner Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 03/29/2010 09:26 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> I'm still using 2.6.32.9. Is it ok to apply this against 2.6.32.9? > > Oh, and do I need to keep the black list entry or get rid of it? It doesn't matter. It has no effect anyway. -- tejun