From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Working around bogus HPAs in libata Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:35:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4BD28307.3090003@kernel.org> References: <1269192318.18314.218.camel@localhost> <4BB5637E.4050604@kernel.org> <1270245450.12516.187.camel@localhost> <4BBA95F8.7070909@kernel.org> <1270520930.24287.102.camel@localhost> <4BBA9D83.2040909@kernel.org> <1272075995.11697.41.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:55175 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752050Ab0DXFfp (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:35:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1272075995.11697.41.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Hello, On 04/24/2010 04:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The patch I posted is rolled up version which contained currently >> pending HPA unlock on shrink patch. >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/45662 > > It sounds like that should go to stable as well. I think it's a bit too pervasive for -stable inclusion. The number of affected systems is very low after all. >> Multiple messages are probably sd doing revalidation of the device. I >> don't think it will cause any problem but I'll look into it later >> today and let you know. > > What did you find? Nothing yet. I just moved and my stuff are still in transit, so I couldn't test anything. I'll get to it once my things arrive (they're expected to next week). Thanks. -- tejun