From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/23] libata-sff: prd is BMDMA specific Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:38:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF25212.4060400@kernel.org> References: <1273520507-32459-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1273520507-32459-18-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4BF20446.9030606@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:46212 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756954Ab0ERIiu (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 04:38:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BF20446.9030606@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, sshtylyov@mvista.com On 05/18/2010 05:06 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > "bmdma_prd_dma" is a bit too redundant for my tastes. > > I would prefer "bmdma_prd_addr" or similar. That will be a tad bit confusing w/ the kernel address. That is specifically the DMA address of BMDMA PRD table instead of the kernel visible address. Given the weird nature of that address, I vote for weird redundant name. Thanks. -- tejun