From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: hs@denx.de
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id()
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:33:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C31A6DF.9080109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C31A519.7030806@denx.de>
Hello,
On 07/05/2010 11:25 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Yeah, that's the new polling code kicking in. If the IRQ problem
>> doesn't persiste (which should be the case here), polling will step
>> down after a while and everything will return to normal. If you keep
>> the system running more than ten minutes and use the CF device, does
>> the kernel complain anymore?
>
> No, I can use the CF while kernel is in polling mode, also if the
> kernel switched back to irq mode:
>
> Log, direct after kernel is up:
>
..
> 25: 9 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
> 26: 10000 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
...
>
> No irq is used.
>
> -bash-3.2# dmesg
> [...]
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k init
> IRQ 26: spurious polling finished, reenabling IRQ
> -bash-3.2#
>
> Now it is back in irq mode:
>
> -bash-3.2# cat /proc/uptime
> 419.65 370.56
> -bash-3.2#
>
...
> 25: 9 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
> 26: 10033 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
Cool, so it works as expected. With the new lost/spurious IRQ
handling in place, removing TFLAG_POLLING from read_id for all
controllers shouldn't cause much problem. However, the CF device is a
pretty rare corner case and spurious IRQ handling can deal with it
without too much problem, so leaving things as it is is probably
better.
Thanks for testing.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-05 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 5:57 ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id() Heiko Schocher
2010-05-31 23:55 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-28 5:31 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-02 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05 8:26 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05 8:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05 9:25 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05 9:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-07-26 12:59 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-26 13:11 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C31A6DF.9080109@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).