From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: ahci rmmodable and shouldn't Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:31:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9729D7.70500@gmail.com> References: <201009162256.04765.pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com> <47010.148.87.67.141.1284674336.squirrel@www.xenotime.net> <4C933A8F.2080305@gmail.com> <1284892106.2650.4.camel@sundae-v2> <4C9602E4.4090007@gmail.com> <1284974726.11757.9.camel@sundae-v2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:59429 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756118Ab0ITJbJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:31:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1284974726.11757.9.camel@sundae-v2> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Pedro Francisco Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 09/20/2010 11:25 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote: > Discomfort? Not really, sorry if my stubbornness felt like it. No, I'm > fine with it. :-) > I just thought it was weird the change of behaviour from 2.6.32, plus > felt that the "Used by" field by lsmod was incorrectly set at 0 since > the module is, in fact, being used (e) Hmmm... I don't recall the behavior changing from 2.6.32. Maybe I've been just speaking bullshit this whole time. Can you please post the output of lsmod? Maybe the difference is caused by the split between libahci and ahci? Thanks. -- tejun