linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix
       [not found] <4CC5C8C4.8010602@google.com>
@ 2010-10-26  9:58 ` Tejun Heo
  2010-10-26 18:08   ` Mike Waychison
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-10-26  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Waychison; +Cc: Linux SCSI List, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

(cc'ing linux-ide)

Hello,

On 10/25/2010 08:13 PM, Mike Waychison wrote:
> I'm having problems reliably booting 2.6.36 on one of my development
> systems whereby it looks like the ata_piix driver isn't
> acknowledging interrupts.

Why do you think ata_piix isn't ack'ing IRQs?

> I went through a bit of the recent history here, and it seems that
> things clear up for me if I revert the following two commits in my
> tree:
> 
> 1c5afdf7 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA init"
> c3b28894 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA irq handler"

Those commits look scary but they're code refactoring in nature and
unless I screwed up (definitely possible) things shouldn't break over
them.  Another thing is that they have been in mainline for quite some
time and even shipped with ubuntu 10.10 and this is the first report,
so I'm a bit skeptical they actually are the culprit.

> I usually don't get a trace, but I did get this blurted out once on
> the console:
>
> kinit: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> INIT: version 2.78 booting
> [    5.419165] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [    5.420140] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-smp-mikew #5gca29cdd
> [    5.420140] Call Trace:
> [    5.420140]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff810b207f>] __report_bad_irq+0x3d/0x8c
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b21e6>] note_interrupt+0x118/0x17e
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b29be>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa7/0xcc
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81032da5>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2f
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81453744>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0xc3
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8144d853>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> [    5.420140]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff81037a64>] ? mwait_idle+0x93/0x9b
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81037a0a>] ? mwait_idle+0x39/0x9b
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8102faee>] cpu_idle+0x63/0xd5
> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8193d340>] start_secondary+0x192/0x196
> [    5.420140] handlers:
> [    5.420140] [<ffffffff812e26e6>] (ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x0/0x17)
> [    5.420140] Disabling IRQ #20
> [   34.720103] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x51)
> [   34.724569] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
> [   34.731612] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0
> [   34.740750] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> [   34.745115] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:a0:f7:78:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 81920 in
> [   34.745116]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x24 (host bus error)

Hmm... this is interesting.  The IRQ storm happened while a read
command was in progress.  BMDMA indicates that host bus error occurred
(the DMA controller experienced transfer failure on the PCI side while
trying to write to main memory).  It's curious why the interrupt
handler thought the IRQ wasn't its.  ata_bmdma_port_intr() should have
noticed ATA_DMA_INTR and the command should have been completed
immediately, weird.

> [   34.760490] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
> [   34.764180] ata1: soft resetting link
> [   35.143059] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> [   35.147332] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
> [   35.152730] ata1: EH complete
> 
> As you can see above, something looks to be wrong with ata_bmdma_interrupt.
> 
> Have you seen this problem before?

No, this is the first time and your hardware seems to be developing an
interesting issue.  I suggest trying a different PSU if you have one
available.  That said, it would still be useful to track down why the
error handling isn't working as expected.  How reliably can you
reproduce the problem?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix
  2010-10-26  9:58 ` 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix Tejun Heo
@ 2010-10-26 18:08   ` Mike Waychison
  2010-10-27  2:33     ` Mike Waychison
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Waychison @ 2010-10-26 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Linux SCSI List, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing linux-ide)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On 10/25/2010 08:13 PM, Mike Waychison wrote:
>> I'm having problems reliably booting 2.6.36 on one of my development
>> systems whereby it looks like the ata_piix driver isn't
>> acknowledging interrupts.
> 
> Why do you think ata_piix isn't ack'ing IRQs?

Well, it's the only thing in the logs marked up as using IRQ 20.

> 
>> I went through a bit of the recent history here, and it seems that
>> things clear up for me if I revert the following two commits in my
>> tree:
>>
>> 1c5afdf7 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA init"
>> c3b28894 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA irq handler"
> 
> Those commits look scary but they're code refactoring in nature and
> unless I screwed up (definitely possible) things shouldn't break over
> them.  Another thing is that they have been in mainline for quite some
> time and even shipped with ubuntu 10.10 and this is the first report,
> so I'm a bit skeptical they actually are the culprit.

Ya, I don't see how they change anything either, but I can't pretend to 
really understand what is going on in this code either :(

> 
>> I usually don't get a trace, but I did get this blurted out once on
>> the console:
>>
>> kinit: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
>> INIT: version 2.78 booting
>> [    5.419165] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>> [    5.420140] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-smp-mikew #5gca29cdd
>> [    5.420140] Call Trace:
>> [    5.420140]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff810b207f>] __report_bad_irq+0x3d/0x8c
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b21e6>] note_interrupt+0x118/0x17e
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b29be>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa7/0xcc
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81032da5>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2f
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81453744>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0xc3
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8144d853>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
>> [    5.420140]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff81037a64>] ? mwait_idle+0x93/0x9b
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81037a0a>] ? mwait_idle+0x39/0x9b
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8102faee>] cpu_idle+0x63/0xd5
>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8193d340>] start_secondary+0x192/0x196
>> [    5.420140] handlers:
>> [    5.420140] [<ffffffff812e26e6>] (ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x0/0x17)
>> [    5.420140] Disabling IRQ #20
>> [   34.720103] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x51)
>> [   34.724569] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>> [   34.731612] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0
>> [   34.740750] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
>> [   34.745115] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:a0:f7:78:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 81920 in
>> [   34.745116]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x24 (host bus error)
> 
> Hmm... this is interesting.  The IRQ storm happened while a read
> command was in progress.  BMDMA indicates that host bus error occurred
> (the DMA controller experienced transfer failure on the PCI side while
> trying to write to main memory).  It's curious why the interrupt
> handler thought the IRQ wasn't its.  ata_bmdma_port_intr() should have
> noticed ATA_DMA_INTR and the command should have been completed
> immediately, weird.

To be clear, usually all I see on the console when hanging is:

[   15.411337] Disabling IRQ #20

I've only ever had the above call trace make it out to console once.

Sometimes this happens while mounting the root filesystem, mounting the 
second filesystem (on the same disk) or while loading modules.  I don't 
think the failure is tied to any particular sector.

I don't have any trouble with previous kernels (2.6.34 was fine), and 
backing out the above two commits makes the symptom go away.

> 
>> [   34.760490] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
>> [   34.764180] ata1: soft resetting link
>> [   35.143059] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [   35.147332] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
>> [   35.152730] ata1: EH complete
>>
>> As you can see above, something looks to be wrong with ata_bmdma_interrupt.
>>
>> Have you seen this problem before?
> 
> No, this is the first time and your hardware seems to be developing an
> interesting issue.  I suggest trying a different PSU if you have one
> available.  That said, it would still be useful to track down why the
> error handling isn't working as expected.  How reliably can you
> reproduce the problem?


I can reproduce very reliably on this machine in particular.  I have 
other machines of similar type that seem to be fine (though I need to 
dig into the test result database to be sure).  I'd be happy to try any 
suggestions on this machine.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix
  2010-10-26 18:08   ` Mike Waychison
@ 2010-10-27  2:33     ` Mike Waychison
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Waychison @ 2010-10-27  2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Linux SCSI List, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Mike Waychison wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> (cc'ing linux-ide)
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 10/25/2010 08:13 PM, Mike Waychison wrote:
>>> I'm having problems reliably booting 2.6.36 on one of my development
>>> systems whereby it looks like the ata_piix driver isn't
>>> acknowledging interrupts.
>>
>> Why do you think ata_piix isn't ack'ing IRQs?
> 
> Well, it's the only thing in the logs marked up as using IRQ 20.
> 
>>
>>> I went through a bit of the recent history here, and it seems that
>>> things clear up for me if I revert the following two commits in my
>>> tree:
>>>
>>> 1c5afdf7 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA init"
>>> c3b28894 "libata-sff: separate out BMDMA irq handler"
>>
>> Those commits look scary but they're code refactoring in nature and
>> unless I screwed up (definitely possible) things shouldn't break over
>> them.  Another thing is that they have been in mainline for quite some
>> time and even shipped with ubuntu 10.10 and this is the first report,
>> so I'm a bit skeptical they actually are the culprit.
> 
> Ya, I don't see how they change anything either, but I can't pretend to 
> really understand what is going on in this code either :(
> 
>>
>>> I usually don't get a trace, but I did get this blurted out once on
>>> the console:
>>>
>>> kinit: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
>>> INIT: version 2.78 booting
>>> [    5.419165] irq 20: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" 
>>> option)
>>> [    5.420140] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-smp-mikew 
>>> #5gca29cdd
>>> [    5.420140] Call Trace:
>>> [    5.420140]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff810b207f>] __report_bad_irq+0x3d/0x8c
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b21e6>] note_interrupt+0x118/0x17e
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff810b29be>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa7/0xcc
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81032da5>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2f
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81453744>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0xc3
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8144d853>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
>>> [    5.420140]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff81037a64>] ? mwait_idle+0x93/0x9b
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff81037a0a>] ? mwait_idle+0x39/0x9b
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8102faee>] cpu_idle+0x63/0xd5
>>> [    5.420140]  [<ffffffff8193d340>] start_secondary+0x192/0x196
>>> [    5.420140] handlers:
>>> [    5.420140] [<ffffffff812e26e6>] (ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x0/0x17)
>>> [    5.420140] Disabling IRQ #20
>>> [   34.720103] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x51)
>>> [   34.724569] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 
>>> 0x6 frozen
>>> [   34.731612] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 
>>> 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0, BMDMA stat 0x0
>>> [   34.740750] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
>>> [   34.745115] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:a0:f7:78:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 
>>> dma 81920 in
>>> [   34.745116]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 
>>> 0x24 (host bus error)
>>
>> Hmm... this is interesting.  The IRQ storm happened while a read
>> command was in progress.  BMDMA indicates that host bus error occurred
>> (the DMA controller experienced transfer failure on the PCI side while
>> trying to write to main memory).  It's curious why the interrupt
>> handler thought the IRQ wasn't its.  ata_bmdma_port_intr() should have
>> noticed ATA_DMA_INTR and the command should have been completed
>> immediately, weird.
> 
> To be clear, usually all I see on the console when hanging is:
> 
> [   15.411337] Disabling IRQ #20
> 
> I've only ever had the above call trace make it out to console once.
> 
> Sometimes this happens while mounting the root filesystem, mounting the 
> second filesystem (on the same disk) or while loading modules.  I don't 
> think the failure is tied to any particular sector.
> 
> I don't have any trouble with previous kernels (2.6.34 was fine), and 
> backing out the above two commits makes the symptom go away.
> 
>>
>>> [   34.760490] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
>>> [   34.764180] ata1: soft resetting link
>>> [   35.143059] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>> [   35.147332] ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
>>> [   35.152730] ata1: EH complete
>>>
>>> As you can see above, something looks to be wrong with 
>>> ata_bmdma_interrupt.
>>>
>>> Have you seen this problem before?
>>
>> No, this is the first time and your hardware seems to be developing an
>> interesting issue.  I suggest trying a different PSU if you have one
>> available.  That said, it would still be useful to track down why the
>> error handling isn't working as expected.  How reliably can you
>> reproduce the problem?
> 
> 
> I can reproduce very reliably on this machine in particular.  I have 
> other machines of similar type that seem to be fine (though I need to 
> dig into the test result database to be sure).  I'd be happy to try any 
> suggestions on this machine.


FWIW, with those two commits reverted, things seem usable, though I just 
noticed these in my logs.  As far as I can tell, the error handling is 
working in this case, while with v2.6.36 it doesn't.



Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858479] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858483] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858487] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858493] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:60:d3:9c:55/00:00:00:00:00/e5 tag 0 dma 49152 in
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858495]          res 
51/84:60:d3:9c:55/84:00:00:00:00/e5 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858498] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858500] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   42.858512] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   43.134269] ata1.00: configured for 
UDMA/133
Oct 26 19:14:28 lpw36 kernel: [   43.134286] ata1: EH complete


Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123746] ata1.00: limiting speed to 
UDMA/100:PIO4
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123751] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123754] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123757] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123763] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:a0:47:96:14/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 81920 in
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123764]          res 
51/84:a0:47:96:14/84:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123767] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123768] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:35 lpw36 kernel: [   50.123784] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:36 lpw36 kernel: [   50.391355] ata1.00: configured for 
UDMA/100
Oct 26 19:14:36 lpw36 kernel: [   50.391364] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600153] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600156] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600160] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600165] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:60:ff:88:10/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 49152 in
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600167]          res 
51/84:60:ff:88:10/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600169] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600171] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.600187] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.867655] ata1.00: configured for 
UDMA/100
Oct 26 19:14:41 lpw36 kernel: [   55.867668] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808362] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808365] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808369] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808376] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:00:5f:90:1c/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 131072 in
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808377]          res 
51/84:00:5f:90:1c/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808380] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808382] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   59.808395] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   60.084257] ata1.00: configured for 
UDMA/100
Oct 26 19:14:45 lpw36 kernel: [   60.084270] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423809] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423813] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423818] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423824] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:60:cf:50:1c/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 49152 in
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423825]          res 
51/84:60:cf:50:1c/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423828] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423831] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.423843] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.691312] ata1.00: configured for 
UDMA/100
Oct 26 19:14:53 lpw36 kernel: [   67.691329] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017686] ata1.00: limiting speed to 
UDMA/33:PIO4
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017692] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017694] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017698] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017705] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:08:bf:e8:05/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 4096 in
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017706]          res 
51/84:00:c6:e8:05/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017709] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017711] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:14:58 lpw36 kernel: [   73.017734] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:14:59 lpw36 kernel: [   73.285426] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
Oct 26 19:14:59 lpw36 kernel: [   73.285447] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535362] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535366] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535370] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535376] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:00:97:53:0f/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 131072 in
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535378]          res 
51/84:00:97:53:0f/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535381] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535383] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.535395] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.803082] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
Oct 26 19:15:00 lpw36 kernel: [   74.803099] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177935] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177940] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177944] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177950] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:00:7f:39:11/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 131072 in
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177952]          res 
51/84:00:7f:39:11/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177955] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177957] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.177969] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.453953] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
Oct 26 19:15:02 lpw36 kernel: [   76.453970] ata1: EH complete
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453813] ata1.00: exception Emask 
0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453817] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x26
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453821] ata1.00: failed command: 
READ DMA
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453827] ata1.00: cmd 
c8/00:00:8f:0d:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 131072 in
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453828]          res 
51/84:00:8f:0d:09/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x30 (host bus error)
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453831] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453833] ata1.00: error: { ICRC ABRT }
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.453844] ata1: soft resetting link
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.721461] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
Oct 26 19:15:04 lpw36 kernel: [   78.721473] ata1: EH complete




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-27  2:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <4CC5C8C4.8010602@google.com>
2010-10-26  9:58 ` 2.6.36: Dropped interrupts in ata_piix Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 18:08   ` Mike Waychison
2010-10-27  2:33     ` Mike Waychison

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).