From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Possible regression when going from 2.6.26 to 2.6.32 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:40:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4CCB3F65.60302@teksavvy.com> References: <20101029082612.GA6525@lenny.spiney.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:32591 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761967Ab0J2Vk4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:40:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101029082612.GA6525@lenny.spiney.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfgang Karall Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, saeed.bishara@gmail.com, mlord@pobox.com, tbm@cyrius.com On 10-10-29 04:28 AM, Wolfgang Karall wrote: > when upgrading my QNAP TS-409 device (Marvell Orion based) from kernel > version 2.6.26 (current Debian 5.0/lenny) to 2.6.32 (Martin Michlmayr's > repository at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/orion who's also pointed me > to this list and recipients) only 2 out of the 4 HDD drives connected get > recognized. > > Attached are dmesg outputs from both a successful boot with 2.6.26 > showing all 4 drives and a failed boot with 2.6.32 showing only 2 > drives. Try again with a 2.6.35 kernel -- several sata_mv regressions fixed in there.