From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Message Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF0DC95.2050501@gmail.com> References: <1290755809.2678.14.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101126073805.GB14282@liondog.tnic> <4CEFEEC6.20900@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:45079 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752302Ab0K0KZb (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:25:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alessandro Tagliapietra Cc: Borislav Petkov , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide On 11/26/2010 07:59 PM, Alessandro Tagliapietra wrote: > 2010/11/26 Tejun Heo : >> Can you please just attach them? > > > Sure, here are the files. The file "dmesg" is done via fedora with > kernel 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.x86_64. > > Also, as aked, the lspci -nn. So, it's a different controller. 1b4b:91a3 instead of 1b4b:9123. Hmm... why did they switch vendor id from 11ab? I currently don't have access to the datasheets but does the following blind patch work by any chance? diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c index 3288263..0c39fbb 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c @@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6121), board_ahci_mv }, /* 6121 */ { PCI_DEVICE(0x1b4b, 0x9123), .driver_data = board_ahci_yes_fbs }, /* 88se9128 */ + { PCI_DEVICE(0x1b4b, 0x91a3), + .driver_data = board_ahci_yes_fbs }, /* Promise */ { PCI_VDEVICE(PROMISE, 0x3f20), board_ahci }, /* PDC42819 */ -- tejun