From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Joey Lee <jlee@novell.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, henry.su.ati@gmail.com,
James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] support SATA ODD zero power
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:25:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFFBF8A.6060105@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D0040AC02000023000252F3@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com>
(cc'ing linux-ide)
Hello,
On 12/08/2010 04:36 PM, Joey Lee wrote:
> Dear all expert,
>
> Hi, m... I just google the SATA ODD zero power support and found Henry
> already contribute the patch:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-scsi/2010/6/25/6885558
>
> And, after first round review,
> The second version is here:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg44925.html
>
> But, I didn't see this patch merged in kernel maintain, does there have
> any problem with this patch? or actually the patch already in queue
> waiting to merge to mainline?
>
> I appreciate if can have any comment to me.
IIRC, at the time, the problem was that nobody had the hardware and
the implementation was solely based on the specification only. I
didn't want it to go in without any actual testing, so it was put on
hold for the time being. Do you have access to a device with zsero
power support? If so, are you willing to test the implementation?
Hmmm... at the same time, I'm a little bit doubtful about its
usefulness. How much power does it save? Furthermore, ODDs are often
omitted on mobile devices these days. So, I have a slight reluctance
against including it but if the implementation is clean enough and
there is enough benefits it shouldn't be too difficult to overcome.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D0040AC02000023000252F3@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com>
2010-12-08 17:25 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-08 17:56 [PATCH RFC v2] support SATA ODD zero power Joey Lee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-22 10:38 Joey Lee
2011-02-22 10:48 Joey Lee
2011-03-21 6:07 Joey Lee
2011-03-21 17:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-22 7:06 ` Joey Lee
2011-04-08 9:01 Joey Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFFBF8A.6060105@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=henry.su.ati@gmail.com \
--cc=jlee@novell.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).