From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATA: Add FSL sata v2 controller support Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:10:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4D3639FB.10608@pobox.com> References: <1295248259-14752-1-git-send-email-B33228@freescale.com> <4D342C6E.6000608@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:41385 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752564Ab1ASBKX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:10:23 -0500 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so134458vws.19 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:10:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D342C6E.6000608@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov , kumar.gala@freescale.com, Roy Zang Cc: Xulei , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 01/17/2011 06:47 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 17-01-2011 10:10, Xulei wrote: > >> In FSL sata v2 block, the snoop bit of PRDT Word3 description >> information is at bit28 instead of bit22. > >> This patch adds FSL sata v2 probe and resolve this difference. > >> Signed-off-by: Xulei > > AFAIK, full name is required. > >> Signed-off-by: Roy Zang > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1022ds.dts >> b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1022ds.dts >> index 2bbecbb..9ad41dd 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1022ds.dts >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1022ds.dts >> @@ -475,14 +475,14 @@ >> }; >> >> sata@18000 { >> - compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-sata", "fsl,pq-sata"; >> + compatible = "fsl,p1022-sata", "fsl,pq-sata-v2"; >> reg =<0x18000 0x1000>; >> cell-index =<1>; >> interrupts =<74 0x2>; >> }; >> >> sata@19000 { >> - compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-sata", "fsl,pq-sata"; >> + compatible = "fsl,p1022-sata", "fsl,pq-sata-v2"; >> reg =<0x19000 0x1000>; >> cell-index =<2>; >> interrupts =<41 0x2>; > > Please put this into the separate patch and push thru the PPC tree. I think it's OK to send 100% of this via the PPC tree. The sata_fsl.c patch for data_snoop variability directly keys off a call to platform-specific detail (of_device_is_compatible call). Acked-by: Jeff Garzik