From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Auke Kok Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] ide: use pci_dev->revision Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:26:49 -0800 Message-ID: <4D5C24F9.3070607@intel.com> References: <200708292316.38779.bzolnier@gmail.com> <46D5E77B.5030800@intel.com> <4D5C0EFA.9060507@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:61280 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457Ab1BPT0u (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:26:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D5C0EFA.9060507@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman On 02/16/11 09:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Kok, Auke wrote: > >>> Some places were using PCI_CLASS_REVISION instead of PCI_REVISION_ID so >>> they were not converted by commit >>> 44c10138fd4bbc4b6d6bff0873c24902f2a9da65. > >> that's actually another effort that I'm working on atm. You can either >> hold off on your patch or we'll see how my patches bounce against yours ;) > > What happened to that effort back then I wonder? I'm now dealing with > PCI_CLASS_REVISON piecewise. BTW, there are also new PCI_REVISION_ID users. :-) Ha, that was a while ago :) I've not done any ""real"" driver work for a while now, so feel free to pick this cleanup off the floor and blow some life in it. I currently do not have the time to follow up there :) Auke