From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2323 trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb9/0x16c() Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:01:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4D5D383A.6000503@free.fr> References: <4D5A90D0.9040403@free.fr> <20110216.180347.71107177.davem@davemloft.net> <20110217112842.GS19830@htj.dyndns.org> <4D5D0FFC.40509@free.fr> <20110217125443.GU19830@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]:55971 "EHLO smtp5-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756444Ab1BQPBY (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:01:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110217125443.GU19830@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Yong Zhang , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2011 01:54 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:09:32PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> I applied these patches to linux-next and I blindly fixed some >> minors conflicts. AFAICT, the problem does no longer occur and it >> seems the patches fix the problem. I am not sure I resolved the >> conflict correctly as I know nothing about this subsystem. Shall I >> resend these patches for inclusion and you check they are correct ? > The posted patches are on top of the mainline and the conflicts > against linux-next should be minor. I'm waiting for Jens to pick up > the patches. Great ! Thanks Tejun. -- Daniel