From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: mbizon@freebox.fr
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "irq 4: nobody cared" when loading ahci driver on ce4100
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:59:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7EB9EB.8030807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300129707.28545.34.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net>
On 03/14/2011 01:08 PM, Maxime Bizon wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff& all,
>
> I'm using an Intel CE4100 platform (Sodaville), and when I load the ahci
> driver I get a short lock, then this message.
>
> On the original ahci driver (back in 2007), the ata port interrupts were
> not enabled until irq handler was registred (in ahci_thaw()).
>
> But since commit 1c954a4d9a9e351fa3509533fd8dd5f3821206cd (ahci: clean
> up PORT_IRQ_BAD_PMP enabling), it is now done early in
> ahci_pmp_attach/ahci_pmp_detach:
>
> ata_host_activate => port_start() callback => ahci_port_resume()
>
> before ahci interrupt handler is even registered.
>
> On my board, port irq stat is 0x00400040 before port mask is changed,
> that's why interrupt is triggered immediately.
>
> Any idea on the clean way to fix this ?
Where is ahci_thaw being called? It shouldn't be called before the IRQ
handler is registered - I think it should only be called from the error
handler which would be way later..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 19:08 "irq 4: nobody cared" when loading ahci driver on ce4100 Maxime Bizon
2011-03-15 0:59 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2011-03-15 4:20 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-03-15 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-15 14:48 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-03-15 15:03 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-03-15 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-15 17:03 ` Maxime Bizon
2011-03-15 21:22 ` [PATCH] ahci: don't enable port irq before handler is registered Maxime Bizon
2011-03-16 9:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-16 9:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Maxime Bizon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D7EB9EB.8030807@gmail.com \
--to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).