From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:25:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4EAF66C7.6080909@zytor.com> References: <20111026202235.GA20928@havoc.gtf.org> <1319969101.5215.20.camel@dabdike> <4EAF1731.2070908@zytor.com> <4EAF1FF6.3000500@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:42051 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753101Ab1KAD0P (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:26:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: david@lang.hm Cc: Linus Torvalds , James Bottomley , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML On 10/31/2011 07:17 PM, david@lang.hm wrote: > > what IMAP servers have you used? I find that with a good IMAP server I > can get away with _very_ little processing power in the client and get > good performance (I still am using pine, but with a cyrus IMAP server) > > there are a bunch of IMAP servers out there that are horrible (and even > more IMAP clients that are really doing POP and storing everything > locally, just using the IMAP protocol) > Last I checked if you used pine against an IMAP server it did absolutely no caching, in which case you're of course screwed. I use IMAP on my phone, and with Thunderpants... I mean Thunderbird... and it works quite nicely. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.