From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/62] ata: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic() Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:42:59 +0800 Message-ID: <4ED373C3.4050903@redhat.com> References: <1322371662-26166-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1322371662-26166-11-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <4ED35BFE.6080900@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14354 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255Ab1K1LnW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:43:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ED35BFE.6080900@mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8828=E6=97=A5 18:01, Sergei Shtylyov =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: > Hello. > > On 27-11-2011 9:26, Cong Wang wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang >> --- >> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > IMO, you should do this in a single patch, not piecemeal to keep the = kernel bisectable. > Hi, Please see patch 01/62, https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/35 So even without it, the kernel can still compile, just with some warnin= gs. Thanks.