From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-eh don't waste time retrying media errors (v3) Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:25:49 -0400 Message-ID: <4FA33E2D.1040204@garzik.org> References: <4FA043BE.2010009@teksavvy.com> <4FA04714.7050602@teksavvy.com> <20120501215854.GA21677@google.com> <4FA07655.6090506@teksavvy.com> <4FA07932.2090003@teksavvy.com> <4FA0A3F7.7000401@teksavvy.com> <20120502155414.GB21677@google.com> <4FA1898C.5070108@teksavvy.com> <20120502193343.GA6411@google.com> <4FA18E49.3040103@teksavvy.com> <20120502194603.GB6411@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:63586 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756703Ab2EDCZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 22:25:52 -0400 Received: by qadb17 with SMTP id b17so733380qad.19 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 19:25:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120502194603.GB6411@google.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Mark Lord , IDE/ATA development list On 05/02/2012 03:46 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: >>>> +static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) >>> >>> Return bool?&& maybe split the patch into two - the first separating >>> out the logic into a function, the latter changing emedia handling? >> >> I think the two-liner from v2 is better. > > Heh, I don't know. It probably doesn't matter all that much either > way. Let's let Jeff decide. ;) Queued v3. If anyone is motivated to make additional changes, base them on top of v3...