linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: swestrup@gmail.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IRQ issues with multiple SiI3114's on Kernel 3.2
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 04:10:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5013AC8F.3000606@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJt7KB8JJE9m1WKxkZ+Svbtazr2RW1v4jWAm9zcqxbbqBFWusw@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/27/2012 9:20 PM, Stirling Westrup wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Stirling Westrup <swestrup@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/27/2012 11:40 AM, Stirling Westrup wrote:
>>>
>>>> I recently purchased a large system for use as a backup server for a
>>>> pair of small businesses. It contains a boot drive plus 10 more
>>>> storage drives. Despite having three onboard SATA controllers, the
>>>> motherboard didn't have enough SATA connectors for all the drives, so
>>>> I installed a pair of identical SiI3114 raid cards to handle the extra
>>>> connections. It has a Sandy Bridge chipset, so I installed a 3.2
>>>> kernel.
>>>>
>>>> # uname -a
>>>> Linux ttt 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 29 20:42:29 UTC 2012
>>>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>> ...
>>>> Okay, enough background. Here's the issue: I had no trouble building
>>>> and sync'ing the first array, but when I try to sync the second array,
>>>> I always get the following dmesg an hour or so into the process:
>>>>
>>>> irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>>>> [  346.120572] Pid: 1100, comm: md1_resync Not tainted
>>> 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1
>>>> [  346.120573] Call Trace:
>>>> ...
>>>> [  346.120697] handlers:
>>>> [  346.120699] [<ffffffffa00479e0>] ahci_interrupt
>>>> [  346.120702] [<ffffffffa02f17ec>] sil_interrupt
>>>> [  346.120703] Disabling IRQ #19
>>>> [  346.122145] sched: RT throttling activated
>>> ...
>>>> From this point onward syncing drops to a tiny fraction of its
>>>> previous speed. I've tried booting with 'irqpoll' as the error message
>>>> suggests, but it has had no effect. I'm really not sure if there is a
>>>> conflict between my two SiI3114's or between the SiI's and the Marvell
>>>> controller (although I've never had an issue with Marvell in the
>>>> past), nor how to go about diagnosing or fixing this.  I'll include a
>>>> full dmesg dump below, as well as my currently loaded modules. If
>>>> anyone wants any further info, just ask.
>>>
>>> Have you tried irqbalance to spread the interrupts across cores/cache
>>> domains? https://irqbalance.org/documentation.html
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the tip! I installed irqbalance and rebooted the system,
>> and everything has been running smoothly for the last two hours. I'll
>> let everyone know tomorrow if it actually finished the full 20-hour
>> resync without incidence.

> Alas, all it did was delay the IRQ error by a few hours. Does anyone
> else have any ideas about how I could tackle this?

Try irqpoll and irqbalance together.  Also, which motherboard is this,
exact make/model please.  May be a BIOS issue.  Doesn't seem to be using
MSIs.  If the mobo and cards all support MSIs, enabling that may fix
this as well.

Also what make/model are the SiI3114 cards?  PCIe or PCI?  Have you
tried different slot combinations?  Moving one card to a different slot
may get it routed to PCI INTB instead of INTA.  That may get it mapped
to something other than IRQ#19.  Updating the 3114 boards to their
latest firmware is worth a shot, if not there already.

-- 
Stan



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-28  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-27 16:40 IRQ issues with multiple SiI3114's on Kernel 3.2 Stirling Westrup
2012-07-27 17:24 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-27 22:14   ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-28  2:20     ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-28  9:10       ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2012-07-28 17:48         ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-28 23:41           ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-29  9:24             ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-29 19:00               ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-29 20:17                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-08-01 23:43                 ` Stirling Westrup
2012-08-02  1:08                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-28 18:19         ` Stirling Westrup
2012-07-28 18:45           ` Stirling Westrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5013AC8F.3000606@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swestrup@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).