From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:35:34 +0300 Message-ID: <52B1EAF6.6080905@cogentembedded.com> References: <20131217111920.GA30592@pd.tnic> <20131217164403.GD1062@leaf> <20131217175451.GI30592@pd.tnic> <52B0A93E.7090503@cogentembedded.com> <20131217190610.GJ30592@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131217190610.GJ30592@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Josh Triplett , Rashika Kheria , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 12/17/2013 10:06 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used >> by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata >> thus far. > Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only > for embedded stuff? Like jazz, IDE "is not dead, it just smells funny". > Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? I hope not. To me, it would be a shame e.g. to delete more or less well-designed IDE taskfile interface to the ad-hockery that libata has in its place... > :-) WBR, Sergei