From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Whitelist SSDs that are known to properly return zeroes after TRIM Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:28:54 -0500 Message-ID: <547FD4F6.7090700@ubuntu.com> References: <547FCECB.4090908@ubuntu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:41812 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038AbaLDD26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:28:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 12/03/2014 10:24 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Well. It's a bit stronger than wishful thinking given that OEM > product requirements documents and supply contracts make it so. But > it is not something we can get in writing. OEM product requirements documents and supply contracts sound like forms of writing to me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUf9T2AAoJENRVrw2cjl5Rc2IH/0f1txjITXL7Os4W2KqTUbFj RryTH8pxexysy1flXcUT4nIyoulBnRSDsy6o9DTgPI5lZDgsIVzFaNuYJHBv/Z/n mvnjPXS4gp1cFCogHZ6K1IbMQC2WBs7Hz+Qq9pxvLKBVuifcsF+4VOiCQtz7A6QR nfkPRh9JP7cN0kjNLYVvoNfFDqSVJ8Ac2IbKkB3OeqmeuLoxpL1qG0fSE+A90/nB B9/wVeFiw5nH6Fdyy6kodbt0tF+gwOGBFIynVKO+4E3qeZi28YikLN/m+L09mW/m kW4UXXWDCLnqmrfxy/VTHCKUZruj9uplZ/3UpWl8vC4jJmZM5HYS7GNE+AJurjA= =kslG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----